This
is a review of the Nook e-reader for an Elementary school. The school was contemplating whether it would
be a good decision to buy a class set of 30 Nooks. The school was trying to save money by not
buying 30 copies of a regular book. This
author claims that digital versions of books are just as expensive as regular
books so it they are not cost efficient.
This article goes on to explain that e-books are not as useful as
presented. Some books will read aloud
but that is pretty much the extent of it.
This author was not impressed by Barnes and Noble’s presentation. They apparently stated that these would be
useful for the school because they introduce technology. This author says that it is not good enough to
have technology just because. Although
this article started off very negative, it does show some positive points. Nooks and other e-readers are durable, some
Nooks have internet access, Nook books can be used on other devises, and Nook
has its own apps. At the end of the article
it eludes to the fact that the Kindle Fire is the better investment.
I
do not have access to a Nook e-reader. I understand that the Nook is
mainly just for books and it is probable good for that but for a school I think
the Kindle Fire would be the better choice.
I find it very interesting that this article states the exact opposite
from the last article I read about the Nook as far as pricing is
concerned. I would find it interesting
to compare the prices for e-books along with other e-reader’s books and regular
books. This article says that the Nook
has apps for children but I wonder how many are available. I personally prefer the
android market and would be interested to see how the Nook apps compare. If these were the schools only choice for an
e-reader than I think they would be a great asset but compared with the
alternatives they would not be my first choice.
Yes, it is interesting to find exact opposites reported in different articles. Hopefully it piques your interest enough to investigate further when you have an opportunity.
ReplyDeleteThanks!